It is only prudent that we again come back and address the issue of where bad debt goes. This exercise has gained urgency in light of recent information released by the Bank of International Settlements concerning the growth of debt across the globe. It now appears that the suspicions many of us held for some time are true. Contrary to the previous speculation that emerging markets were deleveraging indications are that not only were the conclusions wrong, but developed nations have been stealthily loading them up with more debt. The reason this was not picked up by many analysts is that it has been accomplished by methods that are off book. We now are finding huge amounts of debt largely hidden from the public eye have accumulated in the form of swaps and forwards.
Debt Hangs Above Us Ready To Explode! |
With low-interest rates many companies have borrowed a great deal of money to buy back stock, this has been one of the forces driving the market ever higher. A comment from a reader several months ago highlights this and why it might be a big problem when he wrote; It is fairly obvious that not all IOU's are deemed as trustworthy, and as trust drains from this over-indebted system, shakiest issuers' debt will lose value fastest. Junk debt is thus a Hindenburg in search of a spark all its own. Wait until corporations discover how difficult it may be to roll over all this share-buyback debt of the last few years.
Artificially low interest rates tend to skew all markets especially the credit and debt markets. This creates a debt explosion that extends into everything including consumer spending and the statistics surrounding their effects on the economy. We should remember debt takes many forms and shapes, it is not contained in auto and student loans. Clever sounding terms like "transitory" are often used to mask growing debt problems and in an effort to brush reality aside. Sometimes a person presenting the case that growing debt is under control will even go so far as asserting some of it is "good debt" or declare the positive effects of more growth outweigh the negatives of loose lending standards.
It should be noted that currently, a great deal of what is being seen as deflation flows from a loop being created from lower interest payments on things like autos, sadly this is a one-off and only goes to mask deeper trends developing under the surface. The fact is debt that cannot be repaid tends to be hidden away and corrupts the true worth of those owed what often amounts to non-collectible sums. Even now we are hearing calls by many people to write off and forgive student debt without any real understanding of the implications such a policy would entail.
Again, I caution those who think this writing off of debt will be an orderly and even process. By that, I'm saying not all debt is created equal. One major difference is whether it is backed by assets or collateral. Many other factors affect the strength or impact of defaults. One example of this is when it becomes payable, some debt is stretched over decades while other obligations are short-term and paid with a balloon payment or all at one time. Also, debt is computed at different interest rates and this can affect its long-term impact. Another often forgotten issue is whom the debt is owed to and the impact default will have on their ability to honor their current and long-term obligations. I have seen several businesses forced into bankruptcy when a large customer defaults and cannot pay its bills.
The Reality Is We Have Not Deleveraged! |
Because of QE and low-interest rates, we have seen increased speculation and with it the creation of leverage or carry trades that multiply risk. This also tends to move demand forward and cause an increase in the improper allocation of capital, both of these actions have a way of causing problems that linger for years. Another issue is that across the globe after 2008 the central banks and governments of the world have played a giant game of "hide the debt," much of it has been disguised by transferring obligations from the banks and individuals onto the backs of the general population by growing what is termed as government debt. The problem is massive debt still hangs above our heads as a Hindenburg in search of a spark.
It is important to consider how this will all play out or shakedown, this is yet to be determined but the ramifications remain powerful. Often unpaid debt shifts the pain or obligation to another party and acts as a wealth transfer, usually, this is not a voluntary act unless the note is being forgiven by the holder. I see bad debts on the rise and the effect to both the economy and the lives of many will be massive and undeniable in coming years. It will show its ugly side by pensions being cut, inflation edging higher, or simply lowering our overall standard of living. The fact is some way, shape, or form the piper must be paid and we will be reminded that there is no such thing as a free lunch.
Bruce -- appreciate your blog and insights. There is a hypothesis being debated out there that argues that the western democracies are headed for a world in which the central banks buy up the government deficit debt issuance and remit the coupons back to the respective treasuries in such massive amounts as to create "balanced budgets". Which enable more government spending etc. It gets to the very core of what money and wealth are, and to the legal/moral/ethical meanings of a debt obligation. In a world with an active dialog about wealth disparities in society and without inflation, it also leads to seductive arguments for "universal income". Appreciate your thoughts. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment. What you write about sounds like a new spin on socialism and central government planning. While such utopian plans sound good in theory reality has shown they simply do not work. The article below makes a case that claims of economic stability are just an illusion.
ReplyDeletehttp://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2016/05/belief-in-false-illusion-of-stability.html
Hide the debt - certainly.
ReplyDeleteSo what's the big debt? Pensions.
The contributions have been redistributed and not invested. Socialist thinking, not capitalist.
Are those debts reported? No. Governments want the ponzi to carry on.
So now think what changes if the debt is reported?
What if they get a personal statement for their share?
Put that in place and it changes.
1. Socialists have a problem
2. Whoever is in power when it comes out has a problem. Unless they manage the reporting.
3. Some people need to be jailed for the fraud.