Sunday, March 16, 2014

The Minimum Wage Will Go Up, Right Or Wrong!

While I'm strongly against raising the minimum wage because it will make America less competitive and slow job growth, I concede the debate is destined to continue until it is raised. I hereby state without a doubt, the minimum wage will go up! Polls show a majority of Americans support this idea. It is my feeling that many people believe the myth this will put more money into the consumers pocket and create economic growth. They fail to recognize it will also spark inflation while reducing opportunity. New twist and wrinkles are being added by the White House and supporters of this increase every week. Expanding the number of workers eligible for overtime pay is another attempt to push this along. Unfortunately much of the impact and pain will directly fall upon small business the real creator of jobs.

I contend the minimum wage is more of a philological benchmark then a tool for solving issues of inequality. While the idea is considered politically popular raising it without considering the negatives would be a mistake. Sadly, that is often the way Washington works. This issue has been framed in a way that makes saying no difficult. Does any politician standing for reelection want to do the right thing and say "no" to "giving poor downtrodden hard working" Americans a raise? This attitude is what got us in the bind we find ourselves in today. Apparently this trend is also still active in Europe and Britain. The reality is as long as people in other parts of the world will work for less we are shooting ourselves in the foot.

A recent article In the BBC announced that in the UK the National Minimum Wage will increase by 19p an hour to £6.50. The new rates will be implemented in October and will benefit a million workers. The UK Business Secretary said he had accepted the recommendation from the Low Pay Commission that the minimum wage should increase by 3%. The increase is higher than the consumer prices index (CPI) rate of inflation, at 1.9%. This means UK workers will be seeing the biggest cash increase in their take home pay since 2008.

What I found most interesting in the article, it went on to say the rate for workers between 18 and 20 years old wages will go up by 10p to £5.13 an hour, a 2% increase and the rate for those aged 16 and 17 will rise by 7p to £3.79, also a 2% rise. This staggered minimum wage attempts not to lock out the young from ever getting their foot in the door. Even more telling of this is that apprentices will earn an extra 5p an hour, taking their wages to at least £2.73. It appears the system in the UK at least makes an effort to keep the door open to younger and less skilled workers who seek real jobs.

The economic reality and reason I consider this so important is that with so few Americans actually paid the minimum wage a higher wage moves the bar and blocks entry to low level jobs. It makes these jobs even more scarce and causes them to be eliminated or disappear. To some workers a salary may represent what they as a person are worth, but in many ways it reflects more on the value of our currency, what it will buy in society and whether a person should or needs to work. A major issue that many Americans and our government continues to ignore is how much the cost of living varies throughout the country.

The cost of a house in California or in a coastal city is far greater than the same house in the Midwest, often demand in certain locations reflects a geographical preference. This should be reflected more in government social programs and they should be skewed to encourage people to relocate to less expensive areas rather than feed money into local economies already showing high demand. Current payouts from these programs remove incentive for those receiving "generous" government payments to seek work in low cost areas because it is relatively easy to make ends meet. In many ways it is the government that has made it to easier to not work.

 Through its safety net of social programs and subsidies government has done unmeasurable long-term harm to the lower ranks of society by muddying barriers to the shrinking middle class. Inequality is not as much an issue between the poor and being middle class. The focus should be centered on how the elite have highjacked a majority of the pie. The fruit of our labor now flows to very few. Raising wages on the low end may make a few people feel better but when it come to addressing the crux of our problem it is like putting lip-stick on a pig as you take the animal to the butcher.

6 comments:

  1. As a minimum wage earner, I think that the problem that is not adressed here is inflation. What happens year after year is that the "minimum wage" becomes less and less in terms of the costs of living, so raising it is merely treading water. Inflation is like a tax on the entire population that allows money to flow into useless and harmful occupations (probably 70 - 80% of today's "jobs" don't add any improvement to the health and happiness of society). The capitalist system now rewards greed and cunning instead of economy and industry, and the real parasites that cause all the suffering need to be cleansed out of the financial system entirely. Bank accounts should only exist for people involved in worthwhile industry and everyone else should be thankful to have their needs met.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comment, you make some very good points. Much of what is going on does not serve society and to many of our resources are being diverted. As far as inflation it is indeed a problem and I'm afraid it is about to get much worse.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here is a quote from my blog (bookofunspin.blogspot.com) about the inflation that is being kept at bay by the river of free money pouring into the marketplace...

    "It's too bad that ordinary Canadians can't get ahead of the curve somehow, and begin to move all of their savings and make all of their deposits into a local Credit Union account, removed from the stormy uncertainty of the teetering global economy. That way, when the Federal Reserve of the United States finally allows interest rates to rise, (causing an eruption of hyper-inflation and the inevitable tsunami of bankruptcies and lay-offs, leaving behind the desolation of crushed stock markets around the world), we can breathe a sigh of relief and continue on a local scale of commerce. When our elected representatives start pounding on their desks and vote unanimously to bring in the MSC as the salvation for our precious charter banks, we can politely shake our heads, herd these ravenous dinosaurs together and cheer as they stampede into the pages of history."

    Exercising reasonable control over currencies, whether they are gold bullion, fiat notes or virtual numbers in a computer network will have to be done at a local level - it's the place where common sense can actually prevail.

    ReplyDelete
  4. P.S. MSC stands for Mandatory Savings Contributions (from the Cyprus Experiment.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You are absolutely correct. Money doesn't grow on trees and simply mandating the businesses pay out more money to employees means that those same businesses have to get the money from somewhere else. That typically means increased cost of goods- or inflation. There seems to be a strong disconnect in the political world between real world economics and political proposed economics. We are seeing big changes to business and job opportunities from the new federal overtime rules. Companies are reducing internship opportunities and looking at lowering starting wages to college grads due to increased overtime expenses. This article goes more into detail http://www3.swipeclock.com/updated-federal-overtime-law-means-tracking-time-employees/

    ReplyDelete
  6. You are absolutely correct. Money doesn't grow on trees and simply mandating the businesses pay out more money to employees means that those same businesses have to get the money from somewhere else. That typically means increased cost of goods- or inflation. There seems to be a strong disconnect in the political world between real world economics and political proposed economics. We are seeing big changes to business and job opportunities from the new federal overtime rules. Companies are reducing internship opportunities and looking at lowering starting wages to college grads due to increased overtime expenses. This article goes more into detail http://www3.swipeclock.com/updated-federal-overtime-law-means-tracking-time-employees/

    ReplyDelete