Shudder is an interesting word, in this case, when talking about the
economy, it is being used as a verb that means to wobble or shake in not
a good way. While the verdict is not yet in, recently there has been
more talk about the lag effect coming home to roost. The lag effect
suggests that it sometimes takes a while before we witness the effect of
an action. When you poison a plant, or tree there is a time lag before the damage
you have inflicted upon it becomes obvious.
This subject was
focused on in two previous articles here on AdvancingTime. The first
piece was titled "Mind The Gap." The second looked at how the policy of
promoting the "Wealth Effect" has started to shift into reverse. It highlighted the fact that when people see their wealth decline or feel poor they tend to cut spending. Today we must add into the economic mix the toll inflation is taking on consumers. This is a difficult situation to correct.
The
reversal in liquidity coupled with higher interest bodes poorly for the
economy going forward. The full impact of this has until now been
ignored by the market. Today all the preconditions of a major pullback
exist. Not only are some of us looking at a hard landing, many of us are
expecting a doozy of a crash. Ironically, much of the market's strength
now seems rooted in squeezing shorts out of their positions.
Through
injecting a huge amount of liquidity and credit into the financial
system central banks have sidestepped or lessened recessions since 2008.
History indicates the probability of a major recession or worse is
nearly unavoidable. Likely this time will not prove to be different and making matters worse is the high level of debt currently outstanding has the potential to create the mother of financial storms.
As for the lag effect, roughly a year ago the Fed embarked upon one of the sharpest-ever reversals in interest policy in history. Most of the impact from that has yet to be fully felt and will take many months to ripple through the economy. The financial system is not the economy even though many people do not recognize the distinction.
The important issue here is that much of Main Street has not yet
recovered from the damage fostered upon it during the Covid-19
diabolical and the damage from soaring inflation and now it faces a
slowing consumer spending. This is a recipe for disaster.
Most programs unleashed by the "Financial-Political Complex,"
due to Covid resulted in much of the money spent flowing rapidly into
the pockets of those
atop the wealth pyramid. Large businesses such as Amazon and major
hospitals have been the winners while the big losers have been the
middle-class, small businesses, and social mobility. For years
the Financial-Political
Complex ignored the growing weakness on Main Street and focused on
rising
GDP numbers that were driven by government deficit spending. Addressing
this now is like trying to turn a battleship around in a lake the size
of a bathtub, nearly impossible.
No matter how much money they throw at this the economy will
not turn around on a dime or spring back.
We are in the early inning of a long game, we have yet to feel the full power of the lag-time effect. Anyone that
thinks next month will be a return to business as usual and fails to
mind the gap between expectations and reality is primed for
disappointment. Too Big To Fail has become deeply embedded in our crony
capitalist society and a key part of the Financial-Political Complex that now
runs the show.
Much of the rationale behind QE has been that it creates what the Fed calls a “Wealth Effect.”
For years this has been a key driver of central bank policy. This view is firmly embedded in the macroeconometric models used by the Fed. The idea is that by inflating asset
prices to make the wealthy (the asset holders) even wealthier, these
people will spend more of what they see as free money from asset price
inflation. The premise is that this additional spending will create
additional demand for goods and services thus providing jobs for the
masses.
Sadly, several times over the years the wealth effect
formula has slid off the tracks and most likely will again. Consumption
does not create wealth, it creates debt. The example that stands out in
the minds of most people is from back in 2008. By loaning
money against homes with little scrutiny as to the borrower's ability to
repay them the Fed created a financial bubble with broad implications. It
could be argued that since 2008, Fed policy has never really addressed
that mess but attempted to paper over it by printing money and expanding
debt through quantitative easing.
 |
Wealth Effect Policies Have Failed To Generate Enough Growth
|
Looking
back at how pursuing policies that breed the Wealth Effect can slide
off track or lose their effectiveness, we see it always centers on the
risk they create. At some point, the combination of easy-to-borrow money
at low-interest rates tends to morph into a high-risk environment of
increased speculation and leverage. In short, savers and investors
seeking a return on their savings are forced out of traditional accounts
because such investments get ravaged by inflation.
 |
Many Consumers Bought Into This
|
The 2008 financial crisis caused the biggest recession since
the great depression of 1930. It is also referred to as the global
financial crisis (GFC). Over the last several years, the Fed has been
getting a great deal of well-deserved bad press for driving inequality
and fracturing society.
Since 2008 it has become apparent the Fed has
created an unfair system that is broken, unfair, and corrupt. This has affected different generations in rather specific ways.Following the GFC
the Federal Reserve and the Bush administration spent
hundreds of billions of dollars to add liquidity to the financial
markets. They worked hard to avoid a complete collapse. They almost
didn't succeed. Today we are spending not billions, but trillions of dollars to keep the same corrupt policy moving forward.
History shows investors should treat the wealth effect with caution because it is susceptible to reversals. One elephant in the room when it comes
to growing the economy is how "the broken window theory" is spun and
interpreted. The
gist of this theory is that if a window is broken, the subsequent repair expenditure will have no net
benefits for the economy. Still, it is not uncommon to see
destruction touted as a good thing because it promotes spending. In truth, the
idea destruction is good discounts several
facts.
One has to do with where the
money is coming from but whether it is from an insurance company or
someplace else, it still means the money is diverted from being used on
another
purchase. Repairing
a broken window is maintenance spending which doesn’t improve growth
because it doesn’t improve productivity. This expenditure would have
occurred anyway.
The only thing a broken window does is cause maintenance spending
to occur earlier and lower the useful life of the window. Maintenance
spending may keep the economy going it doesn’t provide a
boost. Instead, it is better to invest the money in something which
creates wealth by increasing productivity.
Many people and even economists have real misconceptions as to how
the economy works. Where money flows and who it enriches is a key component of economics. The failure to consider this is a blind spot many people have. Years of being told everything revolves around
spending has diminished the important role savings play in the scheme
of a balanced economy. Fans
of Keynesian economics that encourage government spending to stabilize
the economy during a downturn tend to discount the importance that where
and how money is spent matters a great deal.
 |
Wealth Effect Policy Has A Poor Record
|
In
the end, the nightmare we face all comes back to the fact current policies are
presenting us with diminishing returns while increasing risk. Sadly,
financial corruption has played a huge role in getting us here.
Never
before in our history have Presidents, Fed Chairs, and politicians in
general been able to exploit their power and gained massive wealth
following their time as so-called public servants. A big part of our
current problems is the
elite top-down efforts to control our society has
created an army of government workers,
most un-elected that have been empowered to nibble away at our rights. Bubbling up to the surface is the recognition the Fed has to shoulder a huge responsibility in pushing inequality higher. Powell has even gone so far as to claim there was little demand for loans below $1 million. Sadly,
the same policies that dump huge money into larger businesses because
it is an
easier and faster way to bolster the economy give these concerns a huge
advantage over their smaller competitors.
The long-term
ramifications of destroying smaller businesses will hurt America in the
long run. It eliminates competition, reduces opportunity, and over time
fuels inflation. This drives my angst directed at companies such as
Amazon and big tech. The policy of making people feel better so they
spend more than they can afford is part of voodoo economics. So is
sending jobs abroad and increasing our consumption of imported goods
which has resulted in a massive trade deficit. Good economic policy encourages personal responsibility and is rooted in saving not spending.
(Republishing of this article welcomed with reference to Bruce Wilds/AdvancingTime Blog)
