Monday, June 28, 2021

By 2030 You’ll Own Nothing And You’ll Be Happy

The title of this article projects an ominous future where the masses are controlled by a few. Over the years I have written several articles covering the elite gathering in Davos. The global elites see the World Economic Forum (WEF) as an opportunity to promote their views and various causes. These people often fail to see that many of us have come to view Davos, as a notorious rendezvous for the world's elite that grant us the honor of paying for their schemes in some way or form.

Such gatherings are not for our sake but more for the benefit of plutocrats like Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg and Amazon's Jeff Bezos. The Global Reset they are pushing often reeks of their desire to "break the world" with their ruthless corporate agendas that continue to move political power into the hands of the globalist elite. To counter this attitude reassuring words are cast out over the airwaves to us, the minions of the world, to encourage faith in their wisdom. Oh, what a tangled web those in charge of our fate have woven for us as they rush to sell and bargain away our freedom for power and wealth

When the WEF revealed its Davos 2021 Agenda, it confirmed the event this year would be digital and herald the public unveiling of its Great Reset Initiative. Angel Gurría and Klaus Schwab have outlined how governments and businesses can shape a new labor market that supports workers to thrive in the future. This underlines how the covid-19 pandemic has accelerated systemic changes that were apparent before its inception.

The Covid-19 pandemic has been used as confirmation that no institution or individual alone can address the economic, environmental, social, and technological challenges of our complex, interdependent world. It is also being touted as a reason to support the "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development." One hundred and ninety-three UN member states adopted this 15-year global framework and its ambitious set of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in September 2015.

With 169 targets and over 230 indicators, the 2030 Agenda envisions a secure world free of poverty and hunger, with full and productive employment, access to quality education, and universal health coverage. Thrown into the mix is the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls, and an end to environmental degradation.

The 2030 Agenda is a global framework of action for people, the planet, prosperity, peace, and partnership. It integrates social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development, as well as peace, governance, and justice elements. It makes clear that developing and developed countries alike will implement the Agenda. This is important in ensuring that no one is left behind in the achievement of the SDGs.

A great deal of attention has been given to some of the ideas and vision the WEF has floated. A powerful one became visible when WEF public relations released a video entitled: “8 Predictions for the World in 2030. Its 2030 agenda offers a telling glimpse into what the technocratic elite has in store for the rest of us. It promotes the idea that  by 2030 "You will own nothing. And you'll be happy. The UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is a comprehensive plan that outlines how we can abolish poverty and transform the world into a peaceful, sustainable environment for all. 

When persuasive speakers cloak an agenda in flowery rhetoric, it is often difficult to determine what is noble or separate something altruistic from a sinister plot. Nor, can we be certain that events will unfold more favorably if simply left to develop on their own rather than being manipulated. Still, the ideas flowing out of the World Economic Forum and those seeking a reset and a New One World Order reek of self-serving bias. 

Not all of what the world economic forum predicts will happen but events are being shaped to unfold in that way. Examining what is being called for, sheds a bit of light on how we might expect our future to look. The ideas and predictions of the WEF do not seem so farfetched when you consider,

  • Many people are already comfortable and busy renting things like cars, tools, apartments, so this has become a normal way to live. It is easy to argue that shared commodities save resources.  
  • Many people think the US will be unable to keep its position as the world leader. In fact, in many ways, the US has already abdicated this role.
  • When it comes to things such as organ printing we tend to jump the gun in predicting it is just around the corner but research is continuing and huge progress is being made.
  • The argument you simply can’t feed 10 billion people with meat and move these people into heavy consumer-based lifestyles has merit. At some point, the population must stop expanding or we will create a nightmare of food shortages and cause more damage to the planet. 
  • Down the road, billions of people will be displaced, especially at the shore, because of rising sea levels. Others because of droughts. This means we will have to learn how to deal better with migration or we will have huge cultural wars.   
  • Western values are already being tested because of globalization and migration. The fact that change and the future might scare us does not mean we can simply deny reality and call everything we don’t like or understand a conspiracy. Life is impermanent and nothing stays the way it is. We all die eventually and history shows even big civilizations vanish. 

The agenda to change the world includes things such as controlling people through things such as social credit scores. Expect these to be linked to those you associate with including family members you seldom agree with. Sadly, the people that drew up this plan forgot that what they are proposing is the abolition of private property or communism a theory that has failed to ever bring prosperity to any country. 

Another key part of this plan focuses on controlling the masses, this is also problematic and reeks of totalitarianism. While many people view big tech as the great enabler, a very dark side of it exists, surrendering to its allure gives big tech and those in charge of it the power to enslave the human race. When mankind turns its future over to technology and no longer takes responsibility for learning the most basic lessons that have brought us so far it gives up its soul. The idea we will move in the direction of creating a benevolent form of artificial intelligence that will protect and watch over us is far-fetched. It is frightening to entrust that in the future machines will value the contributions humans make to the overall scheme of things.

Intertwined and masked within the WEF plan are a lot of factors that will negatively impact people. These include a total lack of privacy, the loss of control to move about freely, or the ability to purchase anything you want with your money and controlling how that property is used. Of course, this is all for the greater good, but is it?  History shows that in a society where private ownership is banned or not encouraged people lack skin in the game. This tends to result in people failing to shoulder responsibility for much of what happens.

When society has a problem rather than rely on education, the natural impulse of totalitarians is to limit the choices or speech of others.  The instinct to compel rather than to persuade is evident in many politicians across the world. In the past, each year as the highfalutin Davos extravaganza unfolded I seem to get a pain in my stomach that some might consider envy, but having attended my share of events I consider it more of a sickening feeling related to the over the top self-importance of many attending. Much of my angst is directed at the politicians and such that have their travel expenses picked up by governments. 

How ironic that we pay the same clowns that create so many of our problems to gather in luxury to discuss how they might further their deeds. I find it so interesting that someone flying across the globe on a private aircraft can sit down and discuss their environmental concerns and how each of us must do more to save the planet. In some ways, a person might even go so far as to describe such a gathering as downright evil.

In his writings, George Orwell pointed out that when society has a problem rather than rely on education, the natural impulse of totalitarians is to limit the choices or speech of others.  The instinct to compel rather than to persuade is evident in many politicians across the world. As big businesses and big tech have grown to where the rival or control governments, it is not surprising to see their leaders adopt this attitude. While growing inequality makes the prediction you will own nothing more likely, it does little to guarantee we will be happy. 

Footnote; The three articles below are related to this post.

 (Republishing of this article welcomed with reference to Bruce Wilds/AdvancingTime Blog)


  1. Not too long ago if you said what is posted in this article, you would have been labeled a conspiracy theorist or a nutjob. It took people from the alternative media like James Corbett from the Corbett Report to begin putting the pieces together. He began saying this was the plan of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and Klaus Schwab was the mastermind or (villain) if you prefer behind this plan.

    He also made repeated mention not to take his word for it but to go directly to the WEF website because they actually laid out their plan for the Plebs. Another tidbit James Corbett uncovered is that a "Pandemic" was wargamed at Davos the prior year to Covid 19.

    Bill Gates, George Soros, Tony Fauci are just a few of those that are allowed to attend Davos where the World Economic Forum meets each year. So what's posted in this article has been backed by others in the alternative media.

    1. Rod, I thank you for the comment and want you to know I try hard to stay out of what many people consider the far-right camp. Unfortunately in our polarized world, it is becoming more difficult to not take sides.
      I have come to think education and teaching people to take responsibility for their actions is our only hope for salvation. Still, in my opinion, freedom and the right of choice remain a key part of designing a happy life. Orwellian governments remove those options.

    2. Bruce Wilds "far right" being anyone with modicum of common sense and actual understanding of what words meant up until about 5 years ago before the brain damaged took over

    3. I think you should give people like Alex Jones credit too. He been preaching this long before James Corbett(who I greatly admire)

  2. Life has degenerated into an X-Files episode.

  3. People like to believe the myth that they "own" things. However, they pay 2 or 3 percent tax to the real owner every year. If they don't, men with guns come and take it away. This is on top of the interest paid to the bank, who will also send men with guns if you don't pay. Most cars are financed. Miss a couple of payments, the repo man comes at night. Americans actually own very little.

    1. Yes, in that sense ownership is a "state of mind."

      You might add to that thought the idea that eventually we all die, however, ownership while only temporary often gives an individual rights they would not otherwise have.

  4. If the freedom of the individual is not one of their SDGs then the W6E6F6 can f**k right off with this agenda.

  5. I am very surprised to see that the author is basically in agreement with a lot of the Great Reset agenda... except for the abolition of private property and mass surveillance.

    Forced mass migration, a diet dictated by our overlords, migrations caused by climate change (which is basically fake, I invite those who want to educate themselves to read "Unsettled", by Steven Koonin) or abandoning our values because of the newcomers whose presence is imposed upon us... that is quite reasonable, says Bruce Wilds. It seems the Davos propaganda is more effective than I thought.

    1. I think you may have misinterpreted what I believe. Just because I do not go into a rant over every point in the WEF agenda does not mean I agree with them. In general, I do not endorse the idea of open borders and feel anyone allowed to come into a society should assimilate into the culture.

      As for the climate, it is and has always changed. Today we hear a lot of hype about it, and yes, some of it is caused by the way we live. By the time we can prove it, we will be in a very difficult position.

      For decades I have felt we are beating the hell out of the planet. While I have no faith or use for the idea of "the new green agenda," I'm a strong believer in conserving and not wasting our natural resources.

    2. Agreed, there are serious environmental problems. It's just that global warming is not one of them.


  7. Superb. Add me to the 'follow' list.

  8. orwellian government or orwellian western elitist? people lives themselves effects of choices. because aforementioned richs conduct their malicious thoughts via governments

  9. People simply cannot survive without a sense that they have the ability to improve their own lives. Take away ownership, and that sense disappears.

    It's even worse than what you state. A complex system cannot be run entirely from the centre outwards. While important features of metastability come from central control, resilience comes when control information also comes from the extremities. It's like if you put your hand on a hot stove, it's important that your system reacts to the pain impulses flowing up your arm to remove your hand from the stove. Instead, the EU and other authoritarians prefer to not only ignore pain signals (like the yellow vests) and worse, they call in the riot police to tear gas and mass arrest the neurons that are sending pain signals to the brain--justified, because according to their models, the hand is resting on a soft, warm puppy. Neurons transmitting pain are therefore either mistaken, or have been reading too much Russian-influenced propaganda.

  10. Once conspiracy theories, some have become real. A hard-Left entices a hard-Right. Unfortunately, only the latter is greatly obstructed by the authorities including the police. Ultimately, the top elites will be able to maintain their livelihood of greed, only for a limited time, however.