As a result of recent supply chain disruptions, expect to see new high-tech manufacturing facilities popping up all across America. It can be argued the changes made during the Trump years on how we tax American companies has been a gift to the rich and added to inequality but some of them also pave the way for companies to build new facilities here in America rather than abroad. This was not the chief goal of the legislation but we should celebrate this small victory. In truth, the structural issues that haunt America's competitiveness still far outweigh the benefits of lower taxes.
The ugly truth is American companies have little reason to bring jobs home, the logic that lowering corporate income tax will create a massive flow of jobs to our shore is flawed. The tax bill does little to level the playing field when it comes to issues such as healthcare costs and over-regulation. This means these factors continue to act as barriers to doing business in America. Still, a lot of reasons exist for American companies to locate manufacturing here. With automation and less need for human workers change is on its way. Over the last three decades, robots have become far more common in factories. In many manufacturing facilities, robots do most of the work.
Every Day We See More Robot Workers |
Capital Buys Machines To Reduce Labor |
The big driver for free trade has always been big companies wanting to expand their markets and exploit ways to reduce labor costs. Factories have gotten spectacularly more efficient. They produce more goods with fewer people, their "productivity" is rising. Manufacturing employment is shrinking not mainly because jobs are moving "offshore", but because fewer workers are needed. In most advanced countries, even those with strong export sectors, manufacturing's share of jobs has plummeted. For example, from 1973 to 2010, manufacturing's proportion of employment fell from 22 percent to 10 percent in Canada.
As software and robots improve they will be able to expand the number of functions that they can perform. It suggests that sooner rather than later, the only people working in factories in rich countries will be those who had the time and money to get college degrees. In the past a large slice of America's middle class used to consist of people who started out working in factories, having only a high school degree and would learn on the job. There are concerns about the increasing use of robots and their role in society. Robots are blamed for rising unemployment as they replace workers in some functions.
What has happened in manufacturing is part of a larger paradox at the heart of the economy here in America but throughout the world. While more wealth is being, at the same time, millions of people are being left behind. After adjusting for inflation, the median worker in the US is poorer now than in the mid-1990s. Still, not everyone is suffering, skilled workers, for example, are earning more than ever and so are the very rich. The big beneficiaries have been those who own the capital that can be put to work in the world's increasingly person-free farms, mines, and factories.
Automation Is Replacing Off-shoring! |
China's largest private employer, Foxconn, which manufactures the
iPhone and many other consumer electronics has been busy installing over a
million manufacturing robots. This new wave of technology is leading to
more automation and rapidly replacing off-shoring as the
least expensive way to produce products. Already, China is losing
jobs to countries with even lower wages. But eventually, "you run out
of places to chase the (cheap) labor," says Rodney Brooks, chief
technology officer of Rethink Robotics. Years ago, thanks to some very
clever engineering, a robot named Baxter ran about $22,000. Today the
price is falling and the Baxters of the world are getting better.
In the US, a person working full-time at a low-wage factory might make $20,000 a
year. The biggest difference is that Baxter will work 24/7 whereas its
human counterpart does not. Brooks argues that, in its current
incarnation, Baxter isn’t capable enough to replace a human worker. “The
robot is not a one-to-one replacement,” says Brooks. “We see it as a
tool for ordinary workers to do better.” The goal of Rethink, says
Brooks, is to bring manufacturing back to the US by replacing with
automation some of the repetitive tasks that are currently shipped to
China and other emerging markets. It’s not a bad thing when we get more
stuff for less work, the issue is, can we reinvent and redesign our
economic institutions to keep pace with this change so not all of the
benefits accrue to a very small number of people?”
Simply put, this is the way of the future and the possibility of robot autonomy and potential repercussions that have been
addressed in fiction are a growing concern. One thing
is certain, robots are taking our jobs and learning new tricks far
faster than we humans. Automation and improvements in robots are job
killers, when you add in the dropping cost of replacing often unreliable
human workers one must take a dim view of the employment picture going
forward. Still, as a matter of policy, if robot factories are the future
then let us be wise enough to try everything we can to encourage them to be
located in America.
(Republishing of this article welcomed with reference to Bruce Wilds/AdvancingTime Blog)
great article, Bruce-thank you
ReplyDeleteThanks, I'm glad you liked it. This trend leaves me worried for our children, I feel when jobs are lost, people lose a bit more freedom. Being dependent on the government or others is not to my liking.
DeleteSay hello to Universal Basic Income. We are at the point where our economy which was based on cheap and affordable energy is a thing of the past. Now in order to extract that energy it cost much more but here's the catch. The energy produces need to charge more for that oil but the consumer who's already tapped out can't afford it so they begin to cutback.
ReplyDeleteCompanies in turn who sell goods and services to the consumer needs to now find creative ways to lower the price of their goods and services which means having to do with less workers. Those unemployed workers are now finding it harder to afford the things necessary to provide for their families. So these companies find more ways to lower their overhead costs with fewer workers and lower pay.
This is what's called the snake eating its own tail. Just like Bruce, I too worry about future generations and we haven't EVEN discussed resource depletion such as top soil erosion, phosphorus depletion, fresh water insecurity. That's just for starters.
Thanks for the comment and I must add, well said.
Delete